Skip navigation | Accessibility and accesskey details | Sitemap

About Us: The Role of the National Audit Office

Introduction

The role of the Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), as head of the National Audit Office (NAO), is to report to Parliament on the spending of central government money. We conduct financial audits of all government departments and agencies and many other public bodies, and report to Parliament on the value for money with which these bodies have spent public money. Our relations with Parliament are central to our work, and we work closely with the Committee of Public Accounts. We also work closely with other public audit bodies who have a role in other areas of public expenditure.

Financial Audit

The C&AG and the NAO are responsible for auditing the accounts of all Government departments and agencies and to report the results to Parliament. Individual accounts can range from the Department for Work and Pensions, to the Passport Agency. The C&AG also audits over half of the 'arms-length' public bodies (known as non-Departmental public bodies), examples of which include the Legal Services Commission and the Regional Development Agencies. We are also responsible for auditing all National Loans Fund accounts. We have several international clients, such as the International Labour Organisation, the UN World Food Programme and the World Meteorological Programme. In total, we audit over 500 accounts per year which have expenditure and revenue of over £800 billion.

The C&AG is required to form an opinion on the accounts, as to whether they are free from material mis-statements. The C&AG is also required to confirm that the transactions in the accounts have appropriate Parliamentary authority. If the NAO identify material mis-statements, the C&AG will issue a qualified opinion. Where there are no material errors or irregularities in the accounts, the C&AG may nonetheless prepare a report to Parliament on other significant matters. Such reports may be considered by the Committee of Public Accounts of the House of Commons. Even if no report is made, the NAO will still, where appropriate, write a letter to the management of a body outlining where improvements in their systems could be made. Such ‘management letters’ often lead to significant changes.

Further details are available on the different types of accounts audited.

Value for Money Audit

Around 60 reports to Parliament are presented each year by the Comptroller and Auditor General on the value for money with which Government departments and other public bodies have spent their resources. Under the 1983 National Audit Act, the National Audit Office can examine and report on the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of public spending. We use the following definitions for the ‘three Es’:

Our value for money work covers a wide range of issues. Our reports range from examining the entire operation of the criminal justice system to the major procurement projects of the Ministry of Defence and the administration of European Union schemes by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. We identify topics for examination from careful monitoring and analysis of the risks to value for money across the full range of our responsibilities. And we use staff with a wide range of professional expertise, bringing in outside consultants where necessary.

Relations with Parliament and the cycle of accountability

Relations with Parliament, and in particular with its Committee of Public Accounts (PAC), are central to our work. The C&AG is, by statute, an Officer of the House of Commons and all our main work is presented to Parliament by Order of the House of Commons. Each year around 50 of our reports – both value for money reports and reports on accounts of public bodies – are investigated further by the PAC. The PAC take evidence from Accounting Officers, senior governmental officials who have been specially designated by the Treasury and have a personal responsibility to ensure the prudent stewardship of public funds. The C&AG, or his deputy, and a senior official from the Treasury attend all the Committee’s hearings.

The PAC will then issue their own report. By convention, the Government must reply to their recommendations within two months. The C&AG and/or the PAC can decide to conduct a follow up investigation into the issues raised.

In this way, a cycle of accountability operates. Once public money has been spent by a central government body, the C&AG is free to report to Parliament on the regularity, propriety and value for money with which this has been done. The Committee of Public Accounts can take evidence on this report from the most senior official in that public body, and can then make recommendations to which the Government must respond.

We are also willing to assist Parliament in whatever way we can. Each year, we respond to over 400 queries from Members of Parliament on issues affecting public spending.

Relations with Other Public Audit Bodies

As the auditor of central government expenditure, the NAO is the principal state audit body in the United Kingdom. Other bodies are responsible for other aspects of public spending in the UK.

The various public audit bodies work as closely as possible together to share good practice. To this end, they established the Public Audit Forum to act as a focus for developmental thinking on public audit.

The European Court of Auditors (ECA) are responsible for auditing European Union expenditure in all EU member states, including the United Kingdom. The NAO acts as a liaison point between the ECA and UK departments. We also report regularly to Parliament on issues relating to the expenditure of EU funds in the UK, and on occasion, on wider issues of financial management within the European Union.

Meeting new challenges

We continue to adapt to new challenges and demands. As such we are doing more work to support select committees, including the Treasury and Public Administration committees. We have also recently completed a substantive programme of work for the Environmental Audit Committee looking into the environmental and social impacts of Regulatory Impacts Assessments.

In addition to this, the NAO has created an Efficiency Centre to raise the profile of efficiency, promote best practice, show how efficiency money is spent and help public bodies to achieve efficiency gains. To this end we produce reports to Parliament, good practice guides, briefing documents and have launched an Efficiency Toolkit to help organisations assess their approach to achieving efficiency.

The NAO is also playing a leading role in the development of public audit throughout the world and is using its expertise and standing to assist audit bodies in nations throughout Europe, Asia and Africa. 

 


See also:
   History of the NAO
   Frequently Asked Questions

Back to About us index